WDS 17569+1811 J 1352 : NOTES
discov_num |
notes |
refcode |
J 1352 |
Jonckheere notes ADS positions are 1970 and 1920. In his 1952 paper |
|
|
he uses 1950 ADS position and has a note "two couples?". There is |
|
|
indeed a measure that indeed looks different: |
|
|
1951.62, 39.9@, 3.33", 11.3-11.3. |
J__1952 |
|
Observations incompatible. Is there confusion between different pairs, |
|
|
as thought by Jonckheere (JO 35, p 53)? |
Cou1952b |
REFERENCES
refcode |
metd |
author |
reference |
Cou1952b |
Ma - |
Couteau, P. |
1952JO.....35..181C |
Cou1952b |
|
J. Obs. 35, 181, 1952 |
|
J__1952 |
M+ j |
Jonckheere, R. |
1952JO.....35...37J |
J__1952 |
+Pa |
J. Obs. 35, 37, 1952 |
|
DISCOVERER
idgroup |
discov |
author |
1 |
J |
Jonckheere, R. |
WDS HISTORIC DATA
coord_2000 |
discov_num |
comp |
epoch |
obs |
pa |
sep |
mag_pri |
mag_sec |
spectr |
notes |
coord_arcsec_2000 |
17569+1811 |
J 1352 |
|
2002 |
8 |
21 |
3.9 |
10.00 |
11.00 |
|
N D |
175651.89+181020.7 |
17569+1811 |
J 1352 |
|
2015 |
9 |
23 |
3.9 |
12.25 |
12.70 |
|
N |
175651.89+181020.7 |
17569+1811 |
J 1352 |
|
2016 |
10 |
23 |
3.9 |
12.25 |
12.70 |
|
N |
175651.89+181020.7 |
If you need more information about this double, apply for a
data request form to the WDS.